| 956 | 27 | 6 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
作为典型的双边市场,边际成本为零以及间接网络效应都使得脱胎于工业时代的反垄断法律体系难以对以谷歌为代表的互联网平台公司做出有效规制。更为严重的是,快速变化的技术创新和日益复杂的商业模式使得互联网市场的不确定性空前膨胀,传统的基于"委托-代理"的反垄断治理模式已经面临困境。为适应治理环境的这种变化,理论界提出扬弃既有框架而代之以"实验主义治理"的解决方案。实验主义治理理论强调通过"改变现状"和"共同学习"等机制设计来解决多元合作的激励和不确定性的处理问题。本文试图通过对谷歌(欧洲)反垄断调查案的分析,说明实验主义治理理论在互联网平台反垄断领域的应用机理,并希望以此为起点继续探索未来的"破局"之道。
Abstract：As a typical two-sided market,both of the zero marginal cost and the indirect network effect affect the effectiveness of traditional legal system considering the anti-trust regulation of internet platform giant,such as Google.The growing uncertainty brought by rapid technical innovation and complex business model also makes things worse.To fit with the change of governance environment,scholars proposed a new theory named"Experimentalist Governance"to substitute the traditional way focusing on "Principal Agent"structure.The "Experimentalist Governance"mainly emphasizes the mechanism design to solve the practical problem,of which the two basic mechanisms include the"Destabilization Regimes"and the "Co-learning".In this background,this article analyses the anti-trust investigation case against Google by the European Commission to prove how the"Experimentalist Governance"theory can be applied in this field and how these two mechanism are embodied in this case.
[1]Statement by Commissioner Vestager on Google antitrust investigations at the European Parliament(ECON committee meeting).[EB/OL].http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_STATEMENT-14-1646_en.htm.最后访问时间2015年7月20日。
[2]Google hit by EC antitrust probe[EB/OL].http://www.computerworlduk.com/news/it-business/3251004/google-hit-by-ecantitrust-probe/。最后访问时间2015年7月20日。
[3]EU publishes Google antitrust remedy proposals[EB/OL].http://www.computerworlduk.com/news/it-business/3444154/eu-publishes-google-antitrust-remedy-proposals/.最后访问时间2015年7月20日。
[4]胡凌.互联网企业垄断:现实与未来[J].文化纵横,2014(1):102-105.
[5]王先林.论反垄断法实施中的相关市场界定[J].法律科学,2008,1:123-129.
[6]于馨淼.搜索引擎与滥用市场支配地位[J].中国法学,2012(3):115-127.
[7]Tirole J,Rochet J C.Two-Sided Markets:A Progress Report[J].Rand Journal of Economics,2006.
[8]李剑.双边市场下的反垄断法相关市场界定——“百度案”中的法与经济学[J].法商研究,2010(5):38-45.
[9]Rosenau,J.,Czempiel,E.O.,&eds.Governance without government[J].Journal of Public Administration Research&Theory.1992.
[10]Rhodes,R.The new governance:governing without government.Political Studies XLIV,44(4),18.1996.
[11]Ostrom,E.,Burger,J.,Field,C.B.,Norgaard,R.B.,&Policansky,D.Revisiting the commons:local lessons,global challenges.Science,284.1999.
[12]俞可平.治理和善治:一种新的政治分析框架[J].南京社会科学,2001,(9).
[13]俞可平.全球治理引论[J].马克思主义与现实,2002,(1):20-32.
[14]谷歌史上最大失误:错过Java[EB/OL].http://mobile.51cto.com/hot-270801.htm。最后访问时间2015年7月20日。
[15]施密特.我在Google最大的错误是错过了社交网络[EB/OL].http://www.ifanr.com/392417.最后访问时间2015年7月20日。
[16]Hurwicz L.The Design of Mechanisms for Resource AllocationThe Design of Mechanisms for Resource Allocation[J].American Economic Review,1973,(2):1-30.
[17]Sabel C F,Zeitlin J.Experimentalist Governance[J].Oxford Handbook of Governance,2012:169-183.
[18]Sabel C F,Simon W H.DESTABILIZATION RIGHTS:HOW PUBLIC LAW LITIGATION SUCCEEDS[J].Harvard Law Review,2004,117(4):1016-1101.
[19]Sabel C F,Zeitlin J.Experimentalism in the EU:common ground and persistent differences[J].Regulation&Governance,2012,6(3):410-426.
[20]Antitrust Overview[EB/OL].http://ec.europa.eu/competition/antitrust/overview_en.html。最后访问时间2015年7月20日。
[21]Unger R M.False necessity:anti-necessitarian social theory in the service of radical democracy:from Politics,a work in constructive social theory[M].Verso,2004.p.530.
[22]Sabel C F,Zeitlin J.Experimentalism in the EU:common ground and persistent differences[J].Regulation&Governance,2012,6(3):410-426.
[23]Sabel C F,Zeitlin J.Experimentalist Governance[J].Oxford Handbook of Governance,2012:169-183.
[24]Sabel C F,Zeitlin J.Experimentalism in the EU:Common ground and persistent differences[J].Regulation&Governance,2012,6(3):410-426.
[25]Schweitzer H.Commitment decisions under Art.9of Regulation 1/2003:The developing EC practice and case law[J].2008.
[26]Article 23(2)(a)of Regulation No 1/2003of 16December 2002on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81and 82of the Treaty;http://ec.europa.eu/competition/antitrust/legislation/fines.html.
[27]谷歌或面临欧盟60亿美元反垄断罚款[EB/OL].http://tech.163.com/14/0924/08/A6T5O4HK000915BD.html.最后访问时间2015年7月20日。
[28]Commission Staff Working Document SWD(2014)230-Ten Years of Antitrust Enforcement under Regulation 1/2003(SWD(2014)230/2,9.7.2014):http://ec.europa.eu/competition/antitrust/legislation/regulations.html.
[29]Article 23(2)(a)of Regulation No 1/2003of 16December 2002on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81and 82of the Treaty;或参见http://ec.europa.eu/competition/antitrust/legislation/fines.html.
[30]Sabel,C.F.,and Zeitlin,J.2008.‘Learning from Difference:The New Architecture of Experimentalist Governance in the European Union’.European Law Journal 14:271-327.
[31]Sabel C F,Zeitlin J.Experimentalist Governance[J].Oxford Handbook of Governance,2012:169-183.
[32]Sabel C F,Zeitlin J.Experimentalism in the EU:Common ground and persistent differences[J].Regulation&Governance,2012,6(3):410-426.
[33]Kumm M.Constitutionalism and experimentalist governance[J].Regulation&Governance,2012,6(3):401-409.
[34]Sabel CF.Learning by Monitoring:The Institutions of Economic Development.In:SmelserN,Swedberg R(eds)Handbook of Economic Sociology,pp.137–165.Princeton UniversityPress/Russell Sage Foundation,Princeton,NJ/New York.1994.
[35]EU publishes Google antitrust remedy proposals[EB/OL].http://www.computerworlduk.com/news/it-business/3444154/eu-publishes-google-antitrust-remedy-proposals/。最后访问时间2015年7月20日。
[36]Google rival slams EU Commission over antitrust settlement proposals[EB/OL].http://www.computerworlduk.com/news/public-sector/3532279/google-rival-slams-eu-commission-over-antitrust-settlement-proposals/.最后访问时间2015年7月20日。
[37]Google rival Foundem urges EU to reject remedies[EB/OL].http://www.computerworlduk.com/news/it-business/3447082/google-rival-foundem-urges-eu-to-reject-remedies/.最后访问时间2015年7月20日。
[38]Decision in EU Google antitrust case postponed to next Commission's term[EB/OL].http://www.computerworlduk.com/news/it-business/3571388/decision-in-eu-google-antitrust-case-postponed-to-next-commissions-term/。最后访问时间2015年7月20日。
[39]Antitrust:Commission sends Statement of Objections to Google on comparison shopping service;opens separate formal investigation on Android.http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-15-4780_en.htm.最后访问时间2015年7月20日。
[40]The Search for Harm[EB/OL].http://googleblog.blogspot.co.uk/2015/04/the-search-for-harm.html.最后访问时间2015年7月20日。
[41]Analysing Google’s Public Response to the EC’s Statement of Objections[EB/OL].http://www.foundem.co.uk/fmedia/Foundem_Jun_2015_Analysis/.最后访问时间2015年7月20日。
[42]United States v.Topco Association,Inc.405U.S.596,610(1972).
[43]Matthews R K.The radical politics of Thomas Jefferson:A revisionist view[M].University Press of Kansas,1984.
基本信息:
DOI：10.16823/j.cnki.10-1281/d.2015.05.011
中图分类号:D922.294
引用信息:
[1]贾开.“实验主义治理理论”视角下互联网平台公司的反垄断规制:困境与破局[J].财经法学,2015,No.5(05):117-125.DOI:10.16823/j.cnki.10-1281/d.2015.05.011.
基金信息: